M. ZAFAR-UL-HAQ HIJAZI, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN.---The complaint has been filed under Section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 (FTO Ordinance) against recovery proceedings through bank attachment and non-issuance of refund for Tax Year 2014 by the Commissioner Inland Revenue, Refund Zone, RTO-II, Karachi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant is an AOP engaged in the business of services provider and is assessed to tax with Zone-III, RTO-II, Karachi. The complainant alleged that the Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 122(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for Tax Year 2014, dated 27.08.2018, and created a tax demand of Rs.19,191,237/-. The Department recovered tax demand amounting to Rs.5,274,596/-through Bank attachment.3. Being aggrieved by the action of the Department, the complainant filed an appeal before the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals-V), Karachi, who, vide Order-in-Appeal No. 22 dated 12.02.2019, annulled the impugned order w...
PRESENT:
Nemo
Petitioner(s) by: M. Zafar-ul-Haq Hijazi, Federal Tax Ombudsman Syedain Raza Zaidi, Advisor Dealing Officer. Muhammad Tanvir Akhtar, Advisor Appraising Officer. Safdar Khan, ITP, Authorized.
Respondent(s) by: Nemo.
Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000
Sections: 10(1), 122, 122(1)
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Sections: Nemo
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2026 PTD 538