The petitioner is aggrieved by placement of his name on the Exit Control List ( ECL ), on the Passport Control List ( PCL ) and on the Provisional National Identification List ( PNIL ).2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that according to respondent No.4 the name of the petitioner has been placed on the aforementioned lists on the recommendation of respondent No.5. He submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in two cases of sales tax fraud. However, in both of the cases by orders dated 08.08.2024 and 17.10.2024 the petitioner has been acquitted. He submitted that notwithstanding the fact that no appeal has been filed or that criminal charges are otherwise pending adjudication against the petitioner, it is settled law that merely on the basis of allegations of a criminal offence committed by a person, his name cannot be placed on the ECL. He submitted that the manner in which the petitioner s name has been placed on the aforementioned lists is tantamount to a co...
PRESENT:
Babar Sattar, J
Petitioner(s) by: Fahad Khan Tareen, Assistant Attorney General.
Respondent(s) by: Hafiz Ahsaan Ahmed Khokhar Moazzam Habib along with Malik Abdur Rehman, State Counsel..
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Sections: 24A
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Sections: 2(2A), 11, 25(5), 33, 37A, 72B
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2026 PTD 475