Inaam Ameen Minhas, J.--Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner assails the condonation letter dated 16.01.2025 ("Impugned Condonation") granted by Respondent No. 2(i)/Member IR (Operations) under Section 214-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ("Ordinance") whereby the period of limitation prescribed by the second proviso to Section 177(1) of the Ordinance was enlarged. The petitioners also seek declaration that the respondents/Federal Board of Revenue ("FBR") cannot enlarge the period of limitation prescribed by the second proviso to Section 177(1) of the Ordinance and that the audit proceedings under Section 177 pertaining to Tax Year 2019 is time barred. Lastly, the petitioners seek the interpretation of Section 214-A of the Ordinance.2. The facts of the instant petition, in brief, are that the petitioner having special tax year was selected for audit under Section 177 of the Ordinance, for the period from 01.01.2018 to 31.12.2018 ("Tax Year 2019"), by Commissioner Inland...
PRESENT:
Arbab Muhammad Tahir And Inaam Ameen Minhas, JJ.
Petitioner(s) by: M/s. Sardar Taimoor Aslam and Mudassar Abbas, Advocates.
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Muhammad Asif Jadoon, AAG for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Osama Shahid, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Muhammad Yahya Khan Niazi, Judicial Law Clerk..
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Sections: 177, 177(1), 182(2), 214-A
Law: 177, 177(1), 182(2), 214-A
Sections: 199
Law: 177, 177(1), 182(2), 214-A
Sections: 24-A
Disclaimer / Note: We have reproduced the judgment for facilitation of readers; however, the readers must study the original or certified copy of the above said judgment before referring it in any Court of Law. The judgment as reproduced above is a reported judgment available in law magazines and journals namely: 2026 PTD 577